If you have a 7.1 receiver rated at 90 watts/channel but you are only running 5.1 speakers...? - best rated 5.1 stereo receiver
, Signifying that the 5 speakers for more than 90 watts / channel, since two channels are not used?
The names come from more watts per channel in stereo mode.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Best Rated 5.1 Stereo Receiver If You Have A 7.1 Receiver Rated At 90 Watts/channel But You Are Only Running 5.1 Speakers...?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
It's all about now - the amount of current energy supplies are delivered where to operate multiple channels. To a certain extent, by the speakers. Some players make a "resistive load, while others have a" reactive load. It has an impedance drops significantly, that at low frequencies. The higher the impedance, the higher the current demand.
Those who said they only get 90W, no matter what you are right, but only in theory. Few receivers (price level) have been developed to provide enough food for all at the same 90W (in the usable frequency range.) Is the why people buy separates (preamp / power amp separate processor).
It depends on your receiver, I am an avid reader of the magazine, Home Theater and Sound and Vision Magazine (and others) and recipient of the examination and the amplifier with 2, 5 Speakers and 7 highly connected speakers.
Most Harmon / Kardon and Onkyo are very sincere in their amp rating. Pioneer and Yamaha significantly inflate their ratings of the recipient, in recent months, the S & L Magazine, review of the Yamaha RX-V863 receiver which has (I look like I'm writing) and rated at 105 watts per channel But when I tried, nominal 66 Watt with two attached speakers, 45 watts with five speakers and 41 watts with 6 speakers (the recipient a unit of six channels) and is relatively low, and that is to use 8 ohm speakers.
The Yamaha has a selector 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. ohms and selection of 6 ohms, which limits the power even more.
The August issue of Home Theater magazine tested the Pioneer VSX-918V (page 80) and the receiver is not rated at 95 watts per channel and five-speaker is connected orur could lead to a mere 34.1 watts per channel (President total).
Onkyo actually works better in their series of 130 rated 805 watts per channel, with two speakers that really pushed to 201 watts per channel, with five 127 watts and 121 watts pushing rbis with seven. The results are more accurate and Harmon Kardon receiver, but is rated at 80 watts per channel, was really pushing 93 watts per channel, connected with five speakers. H / K receiver underestimated.
So very tired of what the receiver actually do and what really demands. Actually, my device as a preamplifier and amplifier outboard run better connect my speakers. Amps Outboard almost died, what they publish.
90 watts / channel means that each channel takes up a maximum of 90 watts. True, if you have connected 1 speaker or 7 (not counting pennies, of course).
So if your concern is about driving speakers, while speakers can handle 90W, you're good.
By the way - Watts not happy. You can never all to power. Instead, it will sound.
90 watts / channel means that each channel takes up a maximum of 90 watts. True, if you have connected 1 speaker or 7 (not counting pennies, of course).
So if your concern is about driving speakers, while speakers can handle 90W, you're good.
By the way - Watts not happy. You can never all to power. Instead, it will sound.
No, each channel has an amplifier is limited to 90 watts. The 2 others idle.
Post a Comment